![]() So updating it is just a matter of changing "LICENSE-SERVER-NAME" to the name of the new server. When you open it up it looks like this: SERVER LICENSE-SERVER-NAME 000000000000 The licpath.lic file is just a text file that sits either in the program folder, or in one or more subfolders under C:\ProgramData\Autodesk\CLM\LGS. I'm going to quickly run through the places it can be kept, and then let you know my favorite way to tell a PC where to find a license server and why. Once you know where to look, it's not bad, but there are a couple of places that old server name could be stored. That server name gets baked into some files on the PC, and there isn't always a straightforward way to point to the new server. And if you tell it to use a network license, you then have to tell the software what the computer name or IP address of the license server is. Typically when you install an application like Revit or AutoCAD, you tell the software what kind of license it uses. But a question often comes up: how do the end user PCs find the new license server now? Where a PC Keeps Its License Server Information Reinstalling the license software on a new server is about just as easy as it was on the first server. ![]() A small application sits on a server and end users PCs point to that license server to "check out" licenses as they need them.īut, as we all know, sometimes a server dies or it's time to upgrade it. It's pretty painless to set up, easy to leverage and can be a smart move for groups of users. Many large organizations use Network Licensing to manage their pools of software licenses.
0 Comments
![]() Pictures of your pets may only be posted on Fridays, and must use the flair Familiar Friday. We give these out as a perk when users have made multiple educational, inspirational or other-wise quality posts. Quality contributors to the sub may receive custom flair. If your post was declined, please feel free to post your question to the Weekly Q&A Thread. If this happens, please rethink and rephrase your question, sticking only to the important parts.Īll users require enough karma to post to the board the amount of karma will not be disclosed. While you may feel that you're asking about witchcraft, your question may not be clear enough too much info is just as bad as not enough.Ī moderator may request a tl dr. Repeatedly reposting the same question after it's been removed will be seen as spam and may result in a temporary ban. If your question is not clear then it will be removed. To simplify, your post must be "about" witchcraft. As such we expect the following when making requests.īeginner and 'low-effort' questions may be re-directed to the Weekly Q&A Thread, which is always pinned to the top of r/witchcraft and to the Wiki Beginners Guide. **Witchcraft is wholly about self growth. **All posts must add to the progression of witchcraft: OP Rulesįull rules can be found here Rule 1 - Content | TopicĪll content must relate to the study or practice of Witchcraft.Īll posts must add to the progression of witchcraft OP must be seeking to learn or share knowledge. This is a discussion based subreddit, focused on the practice and study of witchcraft. Questions or Sharing Knowledge regarding Spells, potions, incantations, rituals, herbs, gems, gods and goddesses, and anything that fits the witchcraft umbrella. If you're sharing multiple pictures of a journal, please consider posting all the pictures in one post versus one post per page or your posts might be removed.Check out our FAQ/Wiki! What You Can Post Here. ![]() If you post more than once, please space out the posts, don't post back-to-back. Do not share the same posts repeatedly, and do not post more than four times in a day.If you want to advertise an app, you're looking for r/digitaljournaling.If you would like to advertise your product, contact the moderators. Posts that redirect to external websites or have external usernames are prohibited unless you have obtained prior mod approval.No blog links, social media links, or Youtube/Tiktok/Instagram videos.If your submission breaks the Reddiquette it will be removed. Posts on this subreddit are often times personal, any user found being overly negative towards another poster will receive immediate repercussions relative to their situation. Subs to check out for these topics: r/notebooks, r/stationery, r/fountainpens, r/edc.This is a sub to discuss and share journaling, not a new notebook or stationery haul.Artwork belongs in r/drawing or r/sketchesģ.) No stationery or unused/closed notebooks.Collage art and pages covered in ephemera belong in r/JournalingIsArt.Pictures need to include writing to be considered a journal, or it needs to be obvious there will eventually be writing (before-the-pen is allowed).If you want to use your Reddit as a diary (typed entries) please check out r/DiaryOfARedditor.This sub is for handwritten journal entries, whether it's in a physical notebook or an app.View our Wiki Wiki Page Subreddit Rules 1.) Handwritten entries only If you want to use your Reddit as a diary, please check out r/DiaryOfARedditor.Questions about apps and entries typed in an app belong in r/digitaljournaling.If you keep a handwritten journal or want to discuss journaling, this is the place for you! Other journaling subs: Welcome to the official Journaling subreddit! ![]() If you look at this passage in the Greek text of Rev 11:8 you will find that the word for carcass is ptoma and in this case, strangely, even though it speaks of two individuals the word ptoma is singular in the Nestle-Aland text, (not in the T/R).Ĩ και το πτωμα αυτων επι της πλατειας της πολεως της μεγαλης ητις καλειται πνευματικως σοδομα και αιγυπτος οπου και ο κυριος αυτων εσταυρωθη The reason it is singular in the more ancient and more reliable Greek texts is because it more likely came from the word domen, as one may also see in the above text, we read το πτωμα αυτων, which is like saying "the carcass of them", (which is likely why it was changed or "corrected" in other more recent Greek texts). 2.13 Not in Nestle")ģ) Another thing I noticed was the word used for carcass in Rev 11:8-9, which in this text is נבלה (twice, once in each verse, נבלתיהם, "their carcasses"), which should rather be domen, (דמן). (Scroll down to the short section titled "Three Interesting Variants at Rev. Here is a little primer on the subject matter: Evangelical Textual Criticism: August 2016 The variant reading appears in manifold texts, to the point that even Tischendorf placed the verb form in his text, ( Revelation 2 (Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed.)) I believe the original Greek word in the most ancient texts of Rev 2:13 was the verb anteipas, (antepo, to speak against), but through a process known as itacism it erroneously came to be the name Antipas. ![]() That would mean that, yes, it appears much different and much more "Jewish", but is it the mind of the original author that we are reading or is it the mind of the Jewish scribe who took a late Greek text and converted it back into Hebrew? (I do agree the original Apocalypse may have been in Hebrew).Ģ) The name Antipas should not likely be in this text, and there are a host of reasons why, which I won't try to go into here, but this again tells me that the source text for this Hebrew text is probably much more recent than the translator would like to believe. What this would mean is what I touched on above, that is, that just because the text is full of Hebraisms and Jewish idiomatic thought does not mean it is the mind of the original author: it appears more to be that a more recent text was taken and rendered into the Hebrew/Jewish mindset of the scribe or person who did this work. This does not bode well because, at least, imo, it tells me that this text is based on a version that was quite recent by comparison, (especially compared to what the translator and site owner seems to want to believe). (The phrase may be in a scant few later texts and maybe some Latin texts, I didn't check). Not even the Byzantine textual family says "kings and priests", for the phrase is primarily found only in the Erasmus compilation text which later became the Textus Receptus or Received Text. The more ancient Greek texts do not say the same in Rev 1:6, ( Revelation 1:6 Greek Text Analysis), but instead read, "and has made us a kingdom, priests unto God.". The thinking that one is a king is a pretty big mistake, and we have good examples of that already in the scripture: just look how bad it was for Israel to desire to have a king over them when that first happened? What does the scripture say? Those that desired a king had rejected the Most High in desiring to have a king set over them. Nowhere else are we said to be made kings and priests, but we are said to be made a kingdom of priests. I'll mention just a few things that lead me to believe this to be the case.ġ) "he has made us kings and priests" should not be in this text if it is close to the original. Several things give this away, again, in my opinion. ![]() What I think may be happening here is that the translator may be mistaking the clear and present Jewish or Hebrew mindset displayed in the text for the mindset of the original author of the work. However there are a few telltale signs that make me think that this is not as ancient as the translator might wish to believe. ![]() I read the welcome page and applaud the work that this person is engaged in. From a first glance cursory look my opinion, (and just that, merely my opinion), would be to say be careful. ![]() And so you'd say, alright, well maybe they can grab thoseĮlectrons from something else and that's actually what The 2s and the 2p would beįilled then, we would have 2p6. To share, or get ahold of, two more electrons, because then that outermost shell will have a full number With a Lewis structure, and it might look something like this, where oxygen has one, two, three, four, five, six valence electrons, and you might say, hey, it would be nice if oxygen somehow were able And so in this situation, you say, okay, oxygen has six valence electrons, and oftentimes that's drawn Least a filled SNP subshells in their outer shell. Now, why is six valenceĮlectrons interesting? Well, atoms tend to be more stable when they have a filled outer shell, or in most examples, at Generally aren't reactive, or aren't involved as much in reactions? It has two core, two core electrons. And how many core electrons does it have? And the core electrons ![]() In the outermost shell? You have six electrons here. So the outermost shell is beingĭescribed right over here, this second shell. How might oxygen react, it's interesting to look at Up all the electrons here, I have exactly eight electrons. So I have four right now, I have to have four more, so then you're going to have 2p4. Well, in a neutral oxygen atom, you have eight protonsĪnd eight electrons, so first you're gonna fill the one shell, then you are going to startįilling the second shell, so you're gonna go 2s2, So oxygen's electronĬonfiguration is what? Pause this video and see if And so just to make that point, or make it a little bit clearer, let's look at the electron configuration of an element that we'll Or how a given element is likely to react with other atoms. Is, what is the point? And the point of electronĬonfigurations is, is they can give us insights as to how a given atom Might have been asking yourself this whole time that we've been looking at electron configurations We are now going to talk about valence electrons, and non-valence electrons, whichĪre known as core electrons and so one question that you Once you reach the fourth period and the transition metals they follow an 18 electron rule of stability, but it's the same idea as before in that they are attempting to fill their valence electron shells in order to become stable. This octet rule holds for elements in the second and third periods (or rows) of the periodic table. This need to gain a filled valance electron shell by having 8 valence electrons is known as the octet rule and explains why certain elements are stable or unstable despite being electrically neutral. Neon has 8 valence electrons which is a filled second electron shell and is therefore stable and will be unreactive since it does not need to take electrons from other atoms. And again this can be explained by neon's valence electron configuration which is: 2s^(2)2p^(6). ![]() Now if we take a neutral atom of neon, Ne, which is just to the right of fluorine, neon is practically the opposite of fluorine in terms of reactivity despite both being neutral atoms. In other words, it will react in such a way to gain a new electron and fulfill its valence shell. And since it's so close to being filled, it will desperately want an extra electron which it will take from any nearby atom to do so. But fluorine has 7 valence electrons, 1 away from being filled. The second electron shell holds a maximum of 8 electrons and 8 electron would be considered a filled valence shell and would therefore be stable and unreactive. And this is explained if we look at fluorine's valence shell (the second shell) electron configuration: 2s^(2)2p^(5). ![]() For instance, if we take an atom of fluorine, F, in it's neutral state it has no net charge however it is VERY reactive. So even if an atom is neutral, that is not necessarily its most stable state. And vise versa, something which is unstable is reactive and will engage in chemical reactions to reach a new state. Stability meaning that something is unreactive, that it won't engage in some kind of chemical reaction to reach a new state. The valence shell meaning the outermost electron shell. So being stable when talking about valence electrons means that the valence shell has been filled completely (or half filled). ![]() Everything else is unlimited, from caviar to stewed tripe. Drinks cost extra, but they are sold at a minimal markup, so a bottle of Mercier champagne costs twenty-five euros, about the same as it does in the supermarket. ![]() Last year, more than three hundred and eighty thousand people paid fifty-two euros and ninety centimes for the pleasure of visiting Les Grands Buffets. “Our job is to rid people of their inhibitions.” “Our golden rule is that, if it’s complicated, then that’s a good reason to do it,” Louis Privat, the restaurant’s proprietor, said. It’s at an all-you-can-eat buffet situated in a municipal rec center in the smallish city of Narbonne. The toughest reservation in France, it turns out, is not at a Michelin-starred destination like Mirazur or Septime. (They eat at discounted rates.) I would be refused entry if I showed up in sweatpants, an undershirt, a bathing suit, a sports jersey, flip-flops, a ball cap, or any of three kinds of shorts. If I wanted to bring children under ten years of age, I needed to submit their names at least three days in advance. “We remind you that this reservation is non-modifiable, you cannot change the number of guests, the date of the meal, the hour of the meal, or the name of the beneficiary,” the confirmation e-mail read. The next available table was for a Wednesday in December, at 8:45 p. A week or so later, I went to its Web site, and entered my e-mail address to receive a secure link to make a reservation online. The restaurant is called Les Grands Buffets. Guillaume showed me a picture of the crystal-curtained lobster tower-seven layers of vermillion crustaceans, topped by an upright specimen thrusting its claws to the sky, as though it had just slayed a halftime show, amid a cloud of mist. There was talk of flaming duck and a chocolate fountain. He had just celebrated his birthday there. Last summer, I went to dinner at Guillaume’s, and he mentioned a restaurant, an all-you-can-eat buffet not far from his home town in the South of France. ![]() Guillaume recently alerted me that a man who was fired for not being fun enough at work got his job back, winning five hundred thousand euros in a landmark case. Like: there’s a dance called the Madison that many French people think is a regular feature of parties in the United States. My friend Guillaume is always telling me interesting things. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |